Rebranding Branding - The Distility Blog

We're delighted by the response so far to Brand Scammed! Have a look in the comments section below for some of the quotes we've received by some of the best minds in business. And please add your quote to theirs. You'll be in great company!

By Axle Davids, CEO & Brand Technologist, Distility Branding

This scam is by far the biggest of all Brand Scams and leads to the worst brands of all.

The typical story is a client who needs a branding deliverable like a website or lead generation campaign. They ask their internal resource or a vendor to do a logo, tagline, or “figure out our brand” while they are at it.

The vendor may be well intentioned but ignorant about brand analysis, strategy or standards. They may be overconfident, a branding wannabe who figures that since they have worked “on a brand” they are capable of creating one. Or they may be cynical, preferring to avoid the heavy thinking and collaboration of brand analysis and brand strategy, and just get a billable deliverable out the door.

But the real person to blame here is the buyer. If you still think branding is just a logo, or a slogan, or a brainstorm, you are kickin’ it old- school – and not in a cool retro way.

To read about more Brand Scams or download our new eBook "Brand Scammed!" Click here.

With their "Droid Does" campaign, Motorolla is using the “Repositioning the Competition” strategy, using the iPhone's entrenched brand status as the way to get sticky in our minds. It is the same strategy used when Avis fought Hertz with their classic "“We're number two. We try harder” brand strategy. Key difference here is that the positioning is narrowly focused on the uber geek, male, early adopter.

It is great to see this gutsy positioning, but will it work?

To succeed, positioning must be three things: unique, relevant and compelling.

The Droid positioning is unique - no doubt about it. The hardware, software, and styling all stand apart. The aggressive, robotic branding is world's away from any competitor. Actually, it is the first superphone commercial that some attitude a la Apple's landmark 1984 television advertisement directed by Ridley Scott. The contrast is actually delicious. Apple branded itself as the human, destroying the machine. Droid is branded as the machine.

The Droid positioning is relevant - superphones are the new PCs, and consumers want choice, especially if they are with Verizon.

But is the positioning compelling? I'm an early adopter and don't find any of the things "Droid Does" to be a compelling reason to desire this new device. Higher resolution screen? Nice to have? Yes. Need to have? No. Multi-tasking? The same. And so on.

Where the strategy does succeed, is in manipulating me quite successfully into thinking that the Droid must be the number two choice. Suddenly, Blackberry, Palm, Windows, and the other brands out there seem a lot less relevant, a lot less unique, and far less compelling.